<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
	<record>
		<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">REPORT</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="970" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Fleuret_Idiap-RR-76-2008/IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Multi-layer Boosting for Pattern Recognition</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Fleuret, Francois</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
			<subfield code="i">EXTERNAL</subfield>
			<subfield code="u">http://publications.idiap.ch/attachments/reports/2008/Fleuret_Idiap-RR-76-2008.pdf</subfield>
			<subfield code="x">PUBLIC</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="088" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Idiap-RR-76-2008</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="c">2008</subfield>
			<subfield code="b">Idiap</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="771" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="d">December 2008</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">We extend the standard boosting procedure to train
a two-layer classifier dedicated to handwritten
character recognition. The scheme we propose
relies on a hidden layer which extracts feature
vectors on a fixed number of points of interest,
and an output layer which combines those feature
vectors and the point of interest locations into a
final classification decision.

Our main contribution is to show that the
classical AdaBoost procedure can be extended to
train such a multi-layered structure by
propagating the error through the output
layer. Such an extension allows for the selection
of optimal weak learners by minimizing a weighted
error, in both the output layer and the hidden
layer. We provide experimental results on the
MNIST database and compare to a classical
unsupervised EM-based feature extraction.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	</record>
</collection>