<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
	<record>
		<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">REPORT</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="970" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">George_Idiap-RR-02-2022/IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">A Comprehensive Evaluation on Multi-channel Biometric Face Presentation Attack Detection</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">George, Anjith</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Geissbuhler, David</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Marcel, Sébastien</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
			<subfield code="i">EXTERNAL</subfield>
			<subfield code="u">http://publications.idiap.ch/attachments/reports/2021/George_Idiap-RR-02-2022.pdf</subfield>
			<subfield code="x">PUBLIC</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="088" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Idiap-RR-02-2022</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="c">2022</subfield>
			<subfield code="b">Idiap</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="771" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="d">February 2022</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">The vulnerability against presentation attacks is
a crucial problem undermining the wide-deployment of face
recognition systems. Though presentation attack detection (PAD)
systems try to address this problem, the lack of generalization
and robustness continues to be a major concern. Several works
have shown that using multi-channel PAD systems could alleviate
this vulnerability and result in more robust systems. However,
there is a wide selection of channels available for a PAD system
such as RGB, Near Infrared, Shortwave Infrared, Depth, and
Thermal sensors. Having a lot of sensors increases the cost of
the system, and therefore an understanding of the performance
of different sensors against a wide variety of attacks is necessary
while selecting the modalities. In this work, we perform a
comprehensive study to understand the effectiveness of various
imaging modalities for PAD. The studies are performed on a
multi-channel PAD dataset, collected with 14 different sensing
modalities considering a wide range of 2D, 3D, and partial
attacks. We used the multi-channel convolutional network-based
architecture, which uses pixel-wise binary supervision. The model
has been evaluated with different combinations of channels, and
different image qualities on a variety of challenging known and
unknown attack protocols. The results reveal interesting trends
and can act as pointers for sensor selection for safety-critical
presentation attack detection systems. The source codes and
protocols to reproduce the results are made available publicly
making it possible to extend this work to other architectures.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	</record>
</collection>