<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
	<record>
		<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">CONF</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="970" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">sanders-mmua03/IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Augmenting Frontal Face Models for Non-Frontal Verification</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Sanderson, Conrad</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Bengio, Samy</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="u">http://publications.idiap.ch/index.php/publications/showcite/sanders-rr-03-60</subfield>
			<subfield code="z">Related documents</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Proceedings of the 2003 Workshop on Multimodal User Authentication (MMUA'03)</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="c">2003</subfield>
			<subfield code="a">Santa Barbara, California</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="771" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="d">December 2003</subfield>
		</datafield>
	</record>
	<record>
		<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">REPORT</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="970" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">sanders-rr-03-60/IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Face Verification Using Synthesized Non-Frontal Models</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Sanderson, Conrad</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Bengio, Samy</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
			<subfield code="i">EXTERNAL</subfield>
			<subfield code="u">http://publications.idiap.ch/attachments/reports/2003/rr03-60.pdf</subfield>
			<subfield code="x">PUBLIC</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="088" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Idiap-RR-60-2003</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="c">2003</subfield>
			<subfield code="b">IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="771" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="d">November 2003</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">{NOTE}: {THIS} {REPORT} {HAS} {BEEN} {SUPERSEDED} {BY} {IDIAP-RR} 04-04. {I}n this report we address the problem of non-frontal face verification when only a frontal training image is available (e.g. a passport photograph) by augmenting a client's frontal face model with artificially synthesized models for non-frontal views. In the framework of a {G}aussian {M}ixture {M}odel ({GMM}) based classifier, two techniques are proposed for the synthesis: {UBM}diff and {L}in{R}eg. {B}oth techniques rely on prior information and learn how face models for the frontal view are related to face models at a non-frontal view. {T}he synthesis and augmentation approach is evaluated by applying it to two face verification systems: {P}rincipal {C}omponent Analysis ({PCA}) based and {DCT}mod2 based; the two systems are a representation of holistic and non-holistic approaches, respectively. {R}esults from experiments on the {FERET} database suggest that in almost all cases, frontal model augmentation has beneficial effects for both systems; they also suggest that the {L}in{R}eg technique (which is based on multivariate regression of classifier parameters) is more suited to the {PCA} based system and that the {UBM}diff technique (which is based on differences between two general face models) is more suited to the {DCT}mod2 based system. The results also support the view that the standard {DCT}mod2/{GMM} system (trained on frontal faces) is less affected by out-of-plane rotations than the corresponding {PCA}/{GMM} system; moreover, the {DCT}mod2/{GMM} system using augmented models is, in almost all cases, more robust than the corresponding {PCA}/{GMM} system.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	</record>
</collection>