<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
	<record>
		<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">CONF</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="970" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Annapureddy_DIS_2026/IDIAP</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Building A Civic Tool for Community-Police Engagement to Adapt Neighborhood Policing</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Annapureddy, Ravinithesh</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Šeiko, Staņislavs</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Higham-James, Natalie</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Droz, William</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Fornaroli, Alessandro</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Vollmer, Sarah</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Hecking, Britta Elena</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Gatica-Perez, Daniel</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Civic Tools</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Co-design</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Community Engagement</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Dashboard</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Digital Civics</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Evidence Based</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Participatory Design</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Public Safety</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Research through Design</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
			<subfield code="i">EXTERNAL</subfield>
			<subfield code="u">http://publications.idiap.ch/attachments/papers/2026/Annapureddy_DIS_2026.pdf</subfield>
			<subfield code="x">PUBLIC</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '26), June 13--17, 2026, Singapore, Singapore</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="c">2026</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="z">979-8-4007-2563-0/2026/06</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">10.1145/3800645.3812928</subfield>
			<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
		</datafield>
		<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
			<subfield code="a">Data-driven policing often prioritizes incident records over residents’ lived experiences. In the Baltic city of Riga, with a history of distrust and limited community-police engagement, this can further alienate the public. To bridge this gap, we propose a Research through Design (RtD) inquiry into the development of \textit{Par drošu Rīgu}, a civic tool for community-data-integrated policing. With municipal police, NGOs, and city staff, we ask how RtD enables stakeholder negotiation and which interaction qualities support trust and the use of combined community and incident data. The co-design process included workshops that surfaced divergent notions of safety; material probes designed as boundary objects to negotiate among stakeholders; and a pilot deployment showing how combining quantitative and qualitative data reshapes engagement and trust. Mixed-methods evaluation suggests increased officer-citizen interaction, but frictions in sustaining stakeholder collaboration. We contribute (i) an empirical RtD inquiry with public institutions, (ii) an artifact combining physical and dashboard interactions, and (iii) reflections on interaction design as a boundary-spanning practice for trust and infrastructuring.</subfield>
		</datafield>
	</record>
</collection>